On
the fifth anniversary of the first prisoners arriving at the US base
at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, let me address a question just asked of me
yesterday: how many innocent people are there at Guantanamo?
I do not know for sure, but I do know one.
The Federal Public Defenders office in Portland was appointed by the
D.C. District Court to represent Guantanamo detainee Adel Hamad in
October 2005 as a direct result of a handwritten plea for freedom he
had sent the court six months before. Adel wrote to the court as a
result of the Supreme Court decision in Rasul v.Bush, 542
U.S. 466 (2004), which had confirmed the detainee’s right to file
federal habeas petitions. At the beginning all we knew about him was
that he spoke Arabic and that he was detainee 940, because that was
all the Government would agree to tell us.
They would not even tell us what country he was from.
I first learned Adel’s story during the long night of March 3/4,
2006, when I stayed up all night searching through thousands of
pages of military tribunal (CSRT) records released by the Department
of Defense to find a reference to detainee 940. I read through those
first public CSRT records with great excitement. We had been told by
the President and his administration that all these detainees are
the “worst of the worst.” What I found was entirely different. Adel
was from Sudan but had lived with his wife and children in Pakistan
and Afghanistan, working for various Muslim charity organizations
since 1986. The Government suspected Adel because they didn’t like
the groups he worked for, including, most recently, the World
Assembly of Muslim Youth. WAMY is a major Muslim charity group with
some 2,000 employees and a presence in many countries. Adel was
arrested at his home in Peshawar, Pakistan, at about 1:30 a.m.,
along with his downstairs neighbor, a United Nations refugee. Adel
spent time in custody in Pakistan and at Bagram airbase in
Afghanistan before being transferred to Guantanamo in early 2003.
Adel told the military tribunal that he had worked for WAMY since
2000, as a hospital administrator in Chamkani, Afghanistan and then
later providing relief supplies to refugees in Peshawar, Pakistan,
who were fleeing Afghanistan because of the war. Before that he had
taught at an elementary school. He didn’t sound like the worst of
the worst to me.
After returning from our first Guantanamo visit, the group in our
office with security clearances met behind locked doors with
curtains closed. I remember Steve Wax and Patrick Ehlers telling me
about Adel and their impressions of him as a good man, a strong,
honest man with a nice smile.
Steve said that Adel could not let go of his hand when the meeting
came to an end; I suppose he could not bear to be parted from the
first people to have tried to help him. We talked about how we could
find the evidence to present to the court, how we could show that
Adel had told the military tribunal the truth. I took the lead role
in the international investigation of Adel’s case, with great
assistance from many of my colleagues.
Then, in May, 2005, the Government produced the factual return, as
ordered by the District Court. We learned something stunning. There
was a dissenting voice on the military CSRT panel that declared Adel
an Enemy Combatant. An army major, whose name is classified, had the
courage to file a dissenting report calling the result in Adel’s
case “unconscionable.”
We made contact with Adel’s family in Sudan and confirmed that Adel
had left Sudan in 1986 to find better job opportunities. His wife,
brother in law, and others confirmed that he had worked as a
teacher, then at the hospital and in Peshawar helping refugees.
Adel’s wife described the death of their youngest child while Adel
has been in custody in Cuba.
It was not easy to find the evidence we needed in Afghanistan and
Pakistan; it took many of us a great deal of work. Phone calls in
the middle of the night with Zabi Noori, our excellent Pashto
interpreter and calls at all hours with Professor Sbait, our
wonderful Arabic interpreter. Then finally the breakthrough came,
when Zabi, who had made it his personal mission to find someone at
the hospital, made contact with Dr. Najib, the former Director of
the hospital, an Afghan surgeon living in Kabul, who agreed to meet
with me in Kabul, Afghanistan.
During August 2006, I went with Assistant Federal Public Defender
Ruben Iniguez and Investigator Martin Caballero from Portland to
Kabul, then by road to Jalalabad, and on through the Khyber pass to
Peshawar, and then Islamabad in Pakistan. Ruben and Martin were
gathering evidence on behalf of another detainee client, Nazar Gul,
an Afghan citizen who fled his homeland after the Soviet invasion,
who had lived peacefully for 25 years in the refugee village of
Doaba and who had recently returned to work under the Karzai
government. Nazar was arrested in Gardez, Afghanistan, apparently
because of confusion about his name. We worked cooperatively as a
group on both cases, filming sworn video interviews with over 20
witnesses. It was an intense, somewhat dangerous, period and the
most rewarding experience of my professional life, because we did
everything we had set out to do and more on behalf of Mr. Gul and
Mr. Hamad - we found the evidence of innocence we had been seeking.
All of the information gathered in this investigation was filed with
the court in Mr. Hamad’s case in the form of a motion for summary
judgment. On October 17th, 2006 President Bush signed the Military
Commissions Act, which attempts to strip the federal courts of
jurisdiction to hear Guantanamo detainee habeas cases. All of our
cases are presently stayed pending resolution of this issue.
We have long valued and relied on the Great Writ, yet its very
existence in now challenged by the Government. In 1215, King John of
England, at Runnymede meadow, was forced to sign the Magna Carta,
the first in a series of documents recognizing the right to
challenge detention by the king through the great writ of habeas
corpus. The American Bar Association built a memorial at that site
with a plaque inscribed: "To commemorate Magna Carta, symbol of
Freedom Under Law." Today is a very different, less auspicious
moment - the fifth anniversary of the arrival of the first detainees
at Camp X-Ray, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. But the importance of the fight
for justice is just as great.
On January 5, 2007 our office released
Guantanamo Unclassified,
a short video about Adel Hamad’s case.
It is meant to give you a sense of Adel, through me and some of the
people who knew him. I hope that you can watch it and see him as I
do, a good man, a family man and an innocent man. But his story is
only a part of the answer to the question I was asked.
You see the truth is that the detainees are not numbers, they are
individual people with names and stories and cases that deserve to
be heard by a court of law. So speak with Steve Sady in our office
about Abdul Rahim, a young Syrian tortured by the Taliban, speak
with Ruben Iniguez and Amy Baggio about Nazar Gul. Speak with Steve
Wax and Pat Ehlers and me about Adel Hamad, or Mr. Wax about the
other four detainees my office is representing.
On this fifth anniversary of Guantanamo please spare a thought and a
prayer for Adel Hamad and all other innocents imprisoned without
trial in Cuba, in the hope that the courts and Congress will rise to
the occasion and restore in America the right established in that
English meadow eight centuries ago, the right of an individual to
challenge detention before a court of law.
William Teesdale is an investigator and attorney working with the
Federal Public Defenders Office in Portland, Oregon. Mr. Teesdale, a
barrister, was raised in England and received his legal training at
Leeds University School of Law and the Inns of Court School of Law.